Introduction
Modern technology has ceased to be an external tool, becoming an inseparable climate of our existence. Sarah Murray argues that the era of artificial intelligence did not begin with laboratory breakthroughs, but rather with a long-term cultural process of training the human body to act as an interface. Through ergonomics and fitness culture, society has been prepared to accept AI as a soothing companion in daily life. This article analyzes how smartness has become an invisible constitution of life, where convenience masks a growing dependence on algorithms.
Smartness as a climate: How technology became our daily reality
Technology permeates everyday life, becoming a climate of existence once we stop viewing it as a choice and start treating it as an essential backdrop. This process, rooted in the pedagogy of convenience, makes smart devices transparent. Instead of a revolution, we are witnessing an evolution in which technology colonizes our micro-frustrations by offering ontological comfort. The success of AI stems from its ability to feel "familiar"—these systems do not overwhelm us with superintelligence, but instead become domestic, soft elements of our routine that effectively mask their disciplinary nature.
The body as an interface: How technology becomes a second skin
Technology is transforming into an intimate climate of life, turning the human body into an object of surveillance. Historical processes of standardizing clothing and workplace ergonomics paved the way for modern algorithmic biopolitics. The old ergonomics of the kitchen, which aimed to eliminate unnecessary movement, is the prehistory of today's dashboard. Currently, wearables exploit our need for validation, transforming our biology into a quantifiable ecosystem. Outsourcing the interpretation of one's own body to an algorithm causes the individual to lose autonomy, trading it for the promise of optimization and health.
From tool to interlocutor: The architecture of digital care
Modern technologies, such as smart rings or voice assistants, utilize the politics of recognition to exert control under the guise of care. Thanks to solutionism—the belief that every problem has a technological fix—surveillance becomes invisible. Legal regulations, such as the AI Act, are late to the diagnosis because the market has already normalized prior normalization. As a result, instead of conscious choice, we are dealing with a permanent dependency in which algorithmic recommendation becomes the authority defining the "readiness" and value of our lives.
Summary
The greatest paradox of digital modernity is the fact that the more useful technology becomes, the less we notice its disciplinary dimension. Smartness is not neutral progress, but a system in which freedom becomes a comfortable illusion. Have we already become our own greatest adaptation, functioning like machines? The true challenge is not a robot uprising, but our voluntary consent to live in a world where machine correction is considered the highest form of self-care.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF