Introduction
Incelism is not just an internet phenomenon, but a full-fledged ideology that transforms a subjective sense of grievance into a structured script for retaliation. This article analyzes the evolution of the movement—from innocent support groups to the radical blackpill. You will learn how radicalization mechanisms and network algorithms lead to violence, and which tools, such as the NaBITA and IIR scales, allow institutions to engage in effective prevention. Understanding this "engineering of grievance" is crucial for public safety.
Incel Ideology: From Support Group to Radicalism
The term incel (involuntary celibate) was coined in 1997 as the name of a support group for lonely individuals. Today, it has evolved toward aggressive fatalism. The foundation of this ideology is the blackpill—the belief that relational success is determined solely by genetics (height, cheekbones), which rationalizes misogyny. In opposition stands the redpill, promising status improvement through money and strength, and the bluepill—a belief in respect-based relationships often mocked by incels.
Radicalization progresses through the language of dehumanization (e.g., the term "foid"), which stifles empathy. This process is fueled by manosphere algorithms that optimize user attention through radical emotions and pornographic content, building a false image of human relationships.
Blackpill, Redpill, and Bluepill: Ideological Differences
In the incel world, the hierarchy is defined by the figures of Chad (the masculine ideal) and Stacy (his female counterpart). A sense of injustice leads to De Coensel’s funnel—an eight-stage radicalization process: from low self-esteem and searching for someone to blame, to the planning and implementation of violence. The examples of Elliot Rodger and George Sodini show that perpetrators share a psychological mechanism: hatred toward women and a toxic sense of entitlement.
A key warning sign is leakage—the careless disclosure of attack intentions online. Authorities and institutions must distinguish affective violence (impulsive) from predatory violence (coldly calculated), which characterizes ideological attackers. The "boredom" of procedures and analytical tables is the most effective protective barrier here.
De Coensel’s Funnel: Eight Stages on the Path to Extremism
Effective prevention requires the implementation of BIT/CARE teams in schools and corporations. They utilize tools such as the NaBITA Risk Rubric (hostility assessment) and the IIR (Incel Indoctrination Rubric), which measures the degree of immersion in the doctrine. Intervention is based on a six-week program: from a safety contract and REBT therapy (breaking the A-B-C model: Activating event–Belief–Consequence) to building positive masculinity and social competence.
Institutions should adopt reporting standards free of stigmatization. The media, meanwhile, must avoid building a cult of the perpetrator: mentioning the name only once, not publishing manifestos, and focusing on the operation of safety systems rather than the "choreography" of the crime.
Summary
The fight against blackpill ideology begins with education and digital hygiene. Parents should talk to their children about the online world without moralizing, deconstructing fatalistic beliefs using logic. In a world where rejection becomes fuel for hatred, can we create a culture where empathy is as contagious as the virus of radicalization? The key lies in the transformation from improvisation to structured early-response systems that save lives before tragedy strikes.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF