Introduction
This article analyzes democracy, confronting it with its rivals: anarchism and tutelary rule. Though imperfect and susceptible to elite domination, democracy alone offers mechanisms for self-correction and the protection of minority rights. A key problem remains the definition of "demos" and the impact of economic inequalities on political equality. Drawing on classical theories, this text portrays democracy as a continuous process of negotiation between idea and practice, inclusion and exclusion.
Anarchy, Tutelary Rule, Democracy: The Dispute Over Power and Rights
Democracy, unlike its ideological rivals, is a system of compromise. Anarchism, while promising freedom from the state, fails to protect the individual from community oppression and its informal sanctions. Conversely, tutelary rule, or the governance by experts, tempts with a vision of stability but inevitably leads to oligarchy, where the elite acts in its own interest. Democracy, though imperfect, is the only system that offers institutional mechanisms for defending minority rights.
Democracy: Historical Paradoxes of Exclusion
A fundamental paradox of democracy is the problem of exclusion. Historically, the demos, or the people, never encompassed everyone, which undermines the idea of full equality. Contemporary polyarchy, the real-world form of democracy described by Robert Dahl, offers formal rights, but economic inequalities distort their meaning. Political influence depends on resources, not merely on one's vote.
The greatest threat is the tyranny of the majority. Mature democracies defend against it through constitutions, independent courts, and decentralization of power. However, elite theories, such as Robert Michels' "iron law of oligarchy," expose that real power invariably concentrates in the hands of an organized minority, rendering democracy a facade for rule by the few.
Democracy: Globalization and the Challenges of the Third Transformation
Philosophers have viewed minority protection differently: J.S. Mill emphasized individual liberty, John Rawls focused on just institutions, and Jürgen Habermas advocated for a culture of dialogue. Contemporary challenges, such as globalization, elevate democracy to a supranational level, where it risks technocratization. Simultaneously, its alliance with capitalism generates economic inequalities that undermine political equality.
A crucial, unfinished task remains the redefinition of the concept of demos – whom do we include in the political community? Despite these flaws, democracy remains a desirable system because it alone contains mechanisms for cyclical correction and self-improvement. It is a continuous struggle for the realization of its own ideals.
Conclusion
Democracy is thus a field of constant struggle for inclusion and protection, where the boundaries of popular sovereignty are continuously negotiated. It is not a system given once and for all, but an eternal project under construction. Perhaps it is precisely in this constant transformation, in its readiness for adaptation and redefinition, that its true strength lies, as well as its hope for survival in a changing world.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF