Globalization according to Stiglitz: the betrayal of the social contract

Introduction

In his book "Globalization," Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz exposes the fundamental contradiction of this process. The promise of universal prosperity has clashed with the reality of deepening inequalities. Writing from an insider's perspective – as a former chief economist of the World Bank – Stiglitz reveals how international institutions, led by the IMF, instrumentalized globalization. They imposed harmful, dogmatic reforms on developing countries, prioritizing the interests of capital over the common good.

The IMF: Distorting the Idea of Globalization

At the heart of Stiglitz's critique stands the International Monetary Fund. This institution, originally created to ensure global stability, transformed into a guardian of market orthodoxy. Under the guise of assistance, it imposed a package of reforms on developing countries known as the Washington Consensus. This "shock therapy" included fiscal austerity, rapid liberalization of trade and capital markets, and mass privatization. These prescriptions proved destructive. Instead of curing, they deepened recessions, leading to a wave of bankruptcies and rising unemployment.

Russian Shock Therapy: A Transformational Catastrophe

A catastrophic example was Russia's "shock therapy," which led to hyperinflation and the plundering of national assets by oligarchs. During the Asian financial crisis, the IMF also imposed harmful cuts. Countries like Malaysia, which rejected its recommendations, recovered from the crisis more quickly. Stiglitz emphasizes that alternative development models existed. Gradual, state-controlled reforms in China and a more prudent transformation in Poland proved that social collapse could have been avoided.

The Social Contract Over the Sanctity of Contract

Stiglitz accuses the IMF of being willing to destroy the far more important social contract in the name of the "sanctity of the loan agreement." This meant that creditors were rescued, while the poorest segments of society bore the costs of the crisis. Human tragedies such as unemployment, loss of savings, and educational opportunities were ignored. His critique combines economics with sociology, emphasizing that a stable order cannot be built upon the erosion of trust.

Therefore, Stiglitz advocates for specific reforms. A key reform is the introduction of international bankruptcy law, which would allow states to restructure debt without triggering social catastrophe. Globalization must be managed in a way that serves people, not solely capital.

Conclusion

In the pursuit of global efficiency, have we lost sight of fundamental human dignity? Stiglitz argues that the system intended to liberate us has become a tool where profits, not human fate, are what truly matter. His analysis is a call to redefine globalization – not as a ruthless economic process, but as an opportunity to build a more just and humane world, based on solidarity and democratic control.

📄 Full analysis available in PDF