Mathematics as the foundation of social reality and AI

Fundacja Dobre Państwo • January 11, 2026 • 🇵🇱 Polski

Introduction

Mathematics is not merely a computational tool, but the invisible infrastructure of social reality. From the decimal system to AI algorithms, numbers shape our understanding of rationality, justice, and world order. This article analyzes how mathematical abstractions—such as Arrow’s theorem or the prisoner’s dilemma—become the foundation of modern economics and politics. You will learn why data neutrality is an illusion and how critical thinking about statistics can protect us from digital barbarism.

Numerical Notation Systems Define the Limits of Rationality

The Hindu-Arabic numeral system, with its zero and positional notation, is a global epistemic device that enabled the birth of modern science and Big Data. It determines what we consider computable. Meanwhile, imaginary numbers: a new ontology of debt and science, show that entities initially deemed "unreal" (like the square root of -1 or negative debt) have become essential for describing quantum physics and financial instruments.

Logical Quantifiers: Frameworks for Global AI Regulation

Predicate logic reveals that the AI debate oscillates between a realistic regional vision (where each bloc has its own laws) and a utopian "universal regime." The West vs. the Arab World: Divergent Receptions of AI shows that this technology is interpreted either as an engine of innovation or as a tool for modernization and control. Non-Euclidean Geometry: A Model for Institutional Pluralism teaches us that there is no single "natural" market model—various "institutional geometries" exist, depending on the accepted axioms.

Statistical Errors Distort the Image of Society

The greatest threat is correlation vs. causation: a source of legal errors. Confusing co-occurrence with causation results in credit discrimination and flawed risk profiling. AI exacerbates the phenomenon of mathematical illiteracy, creating a class of tool operators who do not understand their logical limitations. In the judiciary, Type I and Type II errors: the limits of sentencing justice define the balance between security and freedom.

Moderation Algorithms: The New Norm of Free Speech

Modern content moderation shifts the default stance from trust to systemic distrust, where every post is potentially problematic. In the age of data glut, the hermeneutics of chance: meaning in the era of Big Data allows us to distinguish statistically certain coincidences from real structural changes, protecting us from conspiracy theories.

Arrow’s Theorem: The End of the Illusion of Perfect Elections

Mathematics proves that no perfect voting procedure exists. The "will of the people" is performatively constructed by vote-counting rules, not discovered. The prisoner’s dilemma paralyzes climate policy, showing how individual rationality (profit maximization) leads to collective catastrophe. Social Media: The New Payoff Matrix for Attention exploits this mechanism, rewarding polarization at the expense of the common good.

Algorithmic Rationality Displaces Communication

When algorithmic rationality based on clicks replaces debate, the public sphere degrades. Algorithms, acting as "digital dictators," shape our behavior through reward systems, requiring us to return to communicative rationality and consciously redesign the rules of the game.

Conclusion

In a world dominated by algorithms, where numbers become a new form of power, we must ask ourselves: does mathematics liberate or enslave? Can we resist the allure of precise calculations to see the hidden assumptions and consequences of our choices? Ultimately, the future depends on whether we consider the "unforced force of the better argument" more trustworthy than the noisy tyranny of clicks.

📄 Full analysis available in PDF

Summary

This text provides a profound analysis of mathematics not only as a computational tool, but above all as a medium shaping social relations and technological development. The author traces the evolution from the Indo-Arabic system, treated as a key epistemic device, to advanced neural networks and Big Data. The article sheds light on the emancipation of mathematical entities such as imaginary numbers and their role in modern economics. It critically examines statistical pitfalls, distinguishing correlation from causality in predictive algorithms. A key element is an analysis of the aporia of democratic systems through the lens of Arrow's theorem and the problem of gerrymandering. The entire work concludes with a reflection on the need for global AI regulations based on solid logical and ethical foundations, pointing to mathematics as a universal language for describing contemporary civilizational challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was the Indo-Arabic system crucial to the development of AI?

It enabled the introduction of positional notation and zero, which became the foundation for algebra and statistics, without which modern neural networks could not operate on billions of data.

What is the difference between correlation and causation in data analysis?

Correlation is merely the statistical co-occurrence of phenomena, while causation implies a real effect relationship; confusing them leads to flawed AI models and discrimination.

What does Arrow's theorem say about modern democracy?

It proves that every electoral procedure is burdened with mathematical inconsistency, which means that the "will of the people" is always constructed by the adopted rules of vote counting.

How do imaginary numbers influence the description of reality?

Although they seem abstract, they allow for a more complete description of phenomena in electrical engineering or deep learning, showing that mathematical tools can outpace our intuition.

What is the problem of universal AI regulation from a logical perspective?

The problem lies in the logical difference between finding any solution for each region separately and creating one common standard acceptable to all.