Introduction
Modern Western societies are undergoing a profound identity crisis, evolving from an underdog ethos toward a culture of a victim nation. This article analyzes how legal, social, and economic mechanisms have transformed the former meritocracy into a system that rewards entitlement. Drawing on Vivek Ramaswamy’s diagnosis and historical analogies to the fall of Rome, we examine why victim status has become the new political currency. You will learn how the evolution of U.S. law has influenced global trends and what lessons Poland should draw from this crisis to build an agentic civil society instead of a community of eternal grievance.
Rome and America: Historical Symptoms of Decline
History is coming full circle—the modern redistribution of status through the rhetoric of grievance mirrors the Roman panem et circenses. When elites buy peace with subsidies and entertainment, citizens trade virtue for a free spectacle. The key difference lies in the archetypes: the underdog is an agentic figure who, through willpower and hard work, wrests their fate from the hands of destiny. The victim is an archetype of entitlement, demanding restitution for real or symbolic wrongs. Ramaswamy notes that when a system rewards aggrieved status, it begins to recruit "grievance strategists."
Language is the foundation of this shift. "Magic words" such as racism or misogyny are now used to shut down debate and force identity reconstruction. When every misunderstanding is labeled as violence, the line between a real violation of integrity and subjective moral discomfort becomes blurred. This abuse causes language to stop describing reality and instead become a tool for ritual expiation.
The Fourteenth Amendment and the Victimhood Olympics
The evolution of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution shows how the law has cemented victim status. Originally intended to guarantee universal citizenship, judicial rulings (such as the Slaughter-House Cases) limited its potential. The turning point was "Footnote Four" from 1938, which introduced the concept of suspect classes—groups requiring special protection. This created a structural incentive to define oneself through the lens of oppression, what Ramaswamy calls the victimhood Olympics.
This mechanism paralyzes meritocracy, as demonstrated by the Harvard admissions case, where racial identity outweighed objective results. Without controls on the inheritance of capital, meritocracy inevitably degenerates into aristocracy. The author proposes radical systemic surgery: a high inheritance tax coupled with lower taxes on labor and entrepreneurship. The goal is to curb the feudal transfer of privilege and restore social mobility based on character rather than background.
Victim Culture, Competition with China, and Lessons for Poland
The identity crisis has a hard geopolitical dimension. While the U.S. competes over grievances, China is building the world’s largest navy and a powerful industrial ecosystem. The financialization of the economy and "empty money" inflate the assets of the wealthy, drowning the purchasing power of wages and intensifying inequality. In this context, the identity dispute resembles a choir debating in a burning theater—erudite, but helpless against the facts.
For Poland, the lesson is clear: we should not mindlessly copy American "grievance accounting." Instead of celebrating victim status, we must build a civic ethos through schools that teach critical knowledge and public service scholarships. The key to reclaiming individual agency is forgiveness—an act of sovereignty that allows one to move beyond a definition imposed by injury. An example of this attitude is Daryl Davis, who used conversation to lead people away from hate, proving that strength lies in humanity, not in entitlement.
Summary
Replacing a civic ethos with one of entitlement leads to the erosion of the state's capacity for collective sacrifice. A nation's true strength lies not in nurturing wounds, but in reclaiming sovereignty over its own narrative. In the pursuit of righting past wrongs, are we not creating new, equally unjust divisions? The struggle for equality should not perpetuate hierarchies of victims and oppressors, but rather open paths for advancement for those who wish to build a future based on work, merit, and responsibility for the common good.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF