Introduction
The juxtaposition of Lucretius and Stanisław Lem is a fascinating map of philosophical affinities linking ancient atomism with modern cybernetics. Both thinkers are bound by an anthropology of tragic reason—an attitude that rejects transcendence while simultaneously grappling with the difficulty of believing in humanity itself. In this article, you will learn how Lem adapts Lucretius's concepts to describe a world ruled by chance, where freedom and identity become fragile constructs of matter.
Lucretius and Lem: The Atomistic Unity of Matter and Free Will
Lem, like Lucretius, perceives the world as a dispassionate mechanism built of atoms in a vacuum. A key concept linking both creators is parenclisis—the minimal, accidental swerve of atoms from their vertical path. In Lem's work, this concept returns as "causal slack," a microscopic gap in determinism that allows for the existence of free will. Here, however, freedom is not a powerful agency, but rather the logic of unpredictability.
According to Paweł Okołowski’s atomistic anthropology, the human being in Lem’s view is a system conscious of its cosmic contingency. The writer adopts a consistent materialism: consciousness is not a spiritual addition, but an emergent property. It is a new quality arising from an incredibly complex configuration of matter that cannot be reduced to simple physical interactions.
Personal Identity and the Paradox of Resurrection from Atoms
Lem analyzes the problem of identity through the paradox of resurrection from atoms. If a person is a function of particle structure, then their precise reconstruction should bring the individual back to life. However, the writer argues that a copy is not a continuation, but merely an alternative version of fate—a "twin" rather than the original. True identity requires historical continuity and a unique life path.
In this context, Lem’s literary form—a hybrid of essay, report, and fiction—serves as a thought laboratory. Works such as Solaris are not mere entertainment but tools for the reader's transformation. Lem points out that the self is a narrative that cannot be copied without qualia—the internal, subjective experiences that constitute the essence of being someone.
Technology, Evil, and Cosmodicy in an Empty Universe
In Lem's view, technology becomes an autonomous force that has emancipated itself from human control. This process leads to the emergence of psychocivilization—a degenerate form of culture in which an excess of technical means serves to satisfy primitive drives. Lem’s assessment of progress is harsh: technology generates "more evil than good," operating according to its own cold logic of power maximization.
The writer defines evil as a specialty of the human species, for which neither God nor nature is responsible. Instead of traditional theodicy, Lem proposes cosmodicy. This is a heroic intuition suggesting that the universe is worth existing because indifferent matter managed to give birth to a reason capable of independently creating order and recognizing good within chaos.
Summary: Tragic Rationalism in an Empty Cosmos
Lem’s tragic rationalism makes us realize that reason does not bring ultimate solace, but allows us to maintain dignity in the face of cosmic indifference. Although ultimate meaning remains unattainable, our task is to tirelessly create the conditions for it. Lem's philosophy is not a closed system, but a winding path from anxiety toward clarity.
In it, language becomes a laboratory for thought examining itself. And it is here that Lem’s deepest Lucretian trait is revealed: in the conviction that even if we are only dust, we can speak of it in a language worthy of the gods. In a world without transcendence, man becomes the sole source of value.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF