Introduction
Ethics in organizations is not a collection of slogans, but a dynamic process of justifying decisions. It requires separating the description of facts from the procedures of fairness that bind divergent interests into a coherent whole. This article analyzes how classical ethical theories and the thought of Stanisław Lem allow for the reconstruction of order in modern business. You will learn how prudence, dignity, and justice become the foundation of strategy, rather than just its ornament.
Discourse and Prudence: Boundary Conditions for Mutual Understanding
The condition for ethics as a practice of understanding is the confrontation of individual self-awareness with the need for coordinated action. Aristotelian prudence (phronesis) defines the golden mean as a precise point of functional balance, not a bland compromise. Conversely, Confucian ritual (Li) stabilizes interdependencies within the organization, protecting the social fabric from claims of extreme authenticity.
Within the utilitarian tradition, Jeremy Bentham proposed a mathematical calculus of utility, but John Stuart Mill introduced a crucial correction: the harm principle. It protects minorities from the tyranny of the majority and provides space for the multifaceted development of the individual. Kantian deontology goes further, categorically rejecting the instrumentalization of human beings. Treating people as ends in themselves is a prerequisite for any argumentation here. This order is complemented by John Rawls's veil of ignorance—a thought experiment that enforces impartiality and secures the fate of those who might find themselves in the most difficult circumstances.
Society and Government: The External Stakeholder Circle and Fair Wages
Society serves as the founding authority that grants companies a social license to operate. Limited liability is a contract: the environment assumes part of the risk, expecting in return a commitment to the common good. The environment is not a picturesque backdrop here, but a boundary condition. It requires Earth jurisprudence and the design of resilient systems that account for damages dispersed over time.
The government acts as the architect of frameworks, establishing standards that prevent exploitation. Inseparably linked to dignity is the issue of wages—financial stress is not a private problem, but a mechanism for the erosion of productivity and loyalty. These norms are subject to local cultural modulation: from the Asian cult of harmony and African communalism to European rule of law. In each of these contexts, however, ethics requires maintaining a balance between the freedom to innovate and responsibility for the consequences.
Algorithms and Rituals: Operationalizing Ethics and Reputational Capital
Stanisław Lem aptly noted that technology merely amplifies human dilemmas. Decision-making algorithms can violate individual agency; therefore, they require rigorous auditing based on code explainability and anti-discrimination testing. The operationalization of ethics within a company occurs through four lenses of assessment: consequence, duty, character, and fairness under the veil of ignorance.
Essential for building collective character are organizational rituals, such as prudence sessions, pre-mortem analyses, or the "leader's silence" rule. Stakeholder contracts must take the form of enforceable clauses (transparency, environmental), which transform vague declarations into hard accountability mechanisms. Ultimately, ethical consistency builds reputational capital, which is not an ornament but a function of institutional truthfulness. As Lem suggested: if an organization lies about its values, its own tools will become the means of its exposure.
Summary
Organizational ethics is a constant process of calibration between individual profit and the common good. Are we ready to abandon the illusion of simple answers in favor of continuous dialogue and experimentation to build organizations that not only survive but also enrich the world? Building lasting structures requires recognizing that the search for balance is the only true constant in business. Without an ethical skeleton, every promise remains merely an empty gesture in the face of coming turbulence.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF