Introduction
Politics, since antiquity, has been based on the logic of patronage. Today, the role of the patron is filled by the "party baron," and the representative by their client. This transactional arrangement, reduced to a cynical exchange of loyalty for influence, poses a threat to democracy. This article presents Marshall Rosenberg's Nonviolent Communication (NVC) as a tool to disarm this asymmetry and replace the game of interests with a dialogue about fundamental needs.
The Patron-Client System: A Threat to Democracy
Contemporary politics replicates the ancient patron-client model. The party leader, or "party baron," controls electoral lists and finances. In return, the representative guarantees loyalty and votes. This relationship, though seemingly based on cooperation, is deeply asymmetrical. The rhetoric of "party discipline" masks the fact that the leader's interest is equated with the common good. Such an arrangement, reduced to a mere transaction, inevitably leads to cynicism and mutual blackmail, stifling authentic democratic debate.
NVC: A Tool Against Power Asymmetry
Nonviolent Communication acts as an analytical magnifying glass, exposing this game. It reveals that behind the baron's demand for loyalty lies a need for stability and control. Conversely, behind the representative's rebellion is a need for authenticity and agency. The language of empathy allows these needs to be named, shifting the dynamic from coercion to negotiation. The representative ceases to be a supplicant and becomes a partner. The effectiveness of this method is confirmed by social sciences and neuroscience. Empathetic communication reduces aggression and, as explained by polyvagal theory, creates neurobiological conditions for rational debate.
NVC: Observations, Feelings, Needs, Requests
The NVC model is based on four steps. Instead of evaluations, we formulate observations (facts). We name our own feelings, without blaming others. We discover the universal needs underlying emotions. Finally, we make specific requests, not demands. Instead of shouting "This is treason!", a politician says: "I feel anger (feeling) because I need loyalty (need)." This method can be implemented at personal, group, and institutional levels, using tools such as media scripts or "architecture of appreciation" – systematically acknowledging specific actions within a team.
Conclusion
Nonviolent Communication transforms politics from a brutal zero-sum game into a dialogue about shared values. It does not eliminate conflict but civilizes it, providing tools for building understanding across divides. It introduces a language where power is based on recognizing mutual needs, not on coercion. As Marshall Rosenberg put it, words can be windows or walls. This choice determines whether politics will build trust or merely deepen polarization.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF