The Monetary System: The Material Constitution of Capitalism
The international monetary system is the material constitution of capitalism—the lifeblood where power hierarchies and social perceptions of stability intertwine with the technical parameters of finance. It is not merely a trade mechanism, but a complex framework of institutions and norms that reproduces the global order. Understanding its evolution—from gold bars to AI algorithms—reveals how modern societies negotiate the compromise between monetary stability and democratic expectations.
Three Claims and the Evolution of the Gold Standard
The logic of monetary systems is defined by three conflicting claims: the free flow of capital, monetary policy autonomy, and fixed exchange rates. According to the economic trilemma, it is impossible to reconcile all three goals simultaneously. The gold standard before 1914 prioritized capital mobility and fixed rates, sacrificing domestic autonomy. It was politically stable because democratization was in its infancy—governments could defend currency parity at a social cost without fearing electoral pressure.
The system collapsed when the masses gained a voice. During the interwar period, policy autonomy aimed at full employment became a priority, making a return to the iron discipline of bullion impossible. This tension between global capital mobility and state sovereignty remains a central point of contention in financial architecture today.
Bretton Woods and the Dilemma of Global Dollar Dominance
The Bretton Woods system was an attempt to create "embedded liberalism." Architects like Keynes sought to reconcile exchange rate stability with the welfare state by introducing capital controls. However, the dollar became the foundation of the arrangement, giving rise to the Triffin dilemma: to provide the world with reserves, the US had to run deficits, which eventually undermined confidence in the dollar's convertibility to gold.
The contemporary monetary world is a clash of differing civilizational visions. America views money as a tool of hegemony and a natural market order. Europe builds the euro as a normative project intended to mitigate conflicts through technocracy. Meanwhile, Islamic finance offers an alternative based on risk-sharing and the prohibition of pure speculation, which could offer lessons for global stability in an era of crises.
Artificial Intelligence, Asymmetries, and the Future of Order
Today, we are entering an era where artificial intelligence drives floating exchange rates. Algorithms amplify herd behavior, which can destabilize markets faster than traditional speculation. The system is still burdened by a center-periphery asymmetry: developing countries are forced into painful adjustments, while reserve currency issuers enjoy an "exorbitant privilege."
In the face of geopolitical fragmentation, Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) issued by the IMF could become a new meta-standard, limiting the dominance of any single currency. Unfortunately, modern economics often ignores these historical lessons, promoting self-regulation models that fail when confronted with reality. The role of the IMF must evolve from a "crisis doctor" to an architect of fair debt restructuring procedures and the protection of social standards.
Summary
The history of money teaches us that there is no technical "magic formula" for stability. The echoes of disputes over gold and dollars return today in discussions about digital currencies and AI. We must create a system where money serves humanity, not the other way around. Stability is not an end in itself, but a fragile process of constant negotiation between the logic of capital, the demands of democracy, and the claim to global justice.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF