Introduction
Questions about happiness often elicit the knee-jerk response: "more, faster." Psychologist Jonathan Haidt proposes a shift in perspective. Instead of asking "how much?", he asks "where?" His answer is surprisingly simple: happiness comes from between. It arises from proper relationships with people, with work, and with something larger than ourselves. It cannot be acquired directly. One must create the right internal and external conditions for it to emerge, much like a plant needs soil, sun, and water, not motivational coaching.
The Rider and the Elephant: Mind and Its Conflicts
Haidt explains internal conflicts using the metaphor of the rider on the elephant. The rider represents our conscious, analytical reason. The elephant is a powerful system of automatic intuitions, emotions, and habits that guides most of our actions. Attempts at forceful change usually end in failure, because in a clash between willpower and habit, the elephant wins. True change is the art of training: motivating the elephant and wisely designing the environment so it naturally wants to move in the right direction. This involves circumventing mental traps, such as the negativity bias or the paradox of choice, rather than fighting them.
Practical strategies involve organizing stimuli instead of battling them. A rider who doesn't bring unhealthy snacks home doesn't have to wrestle with the elephant later. Shaping habits and rituals that automate desired behaviors becomes crucial.
The S = U + O + W Formula: Components of Happiness
Haidt presents happiness using the formula S = U + O + W. S represents the experienced level of happiness. U is our biological, genetic set point. O refers to life circumstances, such as relationships or a sense of control. W stands for voluntary activities, like practicing gratitude or working with one's strengths. This formula shows that while we cannot influence our genes, we can shape our conditions and activities.
Love and work are the foundation of well-being. Attachment theory demonstrates that the need for security and closeness is a primary biological drive. In turn, work, understood as a calling, becomes a source of meaning when it allows for the utilization of talents and the experience of a state of flow – complete immersion in a task.
Transcendence: The Secular Search for Meaning
The third pillar of happiness is a relationship with something larger than ourselves – a dimension Haidt calls spirituality. This is not about religious dogmas, but about the need for transcendence. Experiences such as awe for nature, art, or moral beauty allow us to "dissolve the ego" and feel part of a greater whole. Contemporary psychology here confirms the wisdom of ancient traditions, from the Stoic focus on what is within our control to the Buddhist teaching on shaping reality through the mind.
Interestingly, misfortune can also lead to growth. The adversity hypothesis posits that life crises can become a catalyst for post-traumatic growth – a reevaluation of life and the deepening of bonds. Our understanding of happiness is also strongly shaped by culture, which defines what is valued – individual autonomy or community harmony.
Conclusion
If happiness arises "from between," then the arena in which we operate is as important as our choices. Social institutions, from companies to cities, can be designed to support the three pillars of well-being. In companies, this means a culture based on psychological safety. In urban planning – prioritizing communal spaces and access to green areas. Research shows that contact with nature in the city reduces stress more effectively than a pay raise. Architecture, therefore, is not just concrete and steel. It is a vehicle for well-being.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF