Introduction
Modern capitalism is facing a profound crisis of institutional imagination. Traditional economic models are failing to keep pace with rapid changes, leading to a systematic drain on the commons. This article analyzes how the concepts of Elinor Ostrom and Elżbieta Mączyńska provide a framework for understanding resource management in the age of artificial intelligence and climate change, offering an alternative to the destructive logic of short-term profit.
Mączyńska: The Tragedy of the Commons as a Systemic Failure
Elżbieta Mączyńska defines the tragedy of the commons as a systemic imbalance where the private sector captures profits while shifting external costs onto the state. To understand this mechanism, one must follow Elinor Ostrom in distinguishing the resource system (stock)—the infrastructure (e.g., a fishery or groundwater basin)—from resource units (flow), which represent the stream of benefits extracted.
Stock vs. Flow: The Difference Between a Resource and Its Extraction
A key challenge is the provision problem—the ability of users to maintain and replenish the stock. This is contrasted with the appropriation problem, which concerns the fair distribution of a limited flow. When distribution rules are unclear, the motivation to care for the resource plummets, leading to its degradation.
Ostrom: Leviathan and Privatization Destroy Self-Governance
Ostrom criticizes the orthodox approach that sees salvation only in an external Leviathan (the state) or radical privatization. Such models assume that users are helpless egoists. In reality, sustainable institutions emerge through local experimentation and the adaptation of rules by the stakeholders themselves.
Ostrom’s Decalogue: Eight Principles for Sustainable CPR Institutions
Effective management of common-pool resources (CPR) is based on eight principles. The foundation consists of clearly defined boundaries for the resource and a precisely identified group of authorized users. System stability depends on the congruence of rules with local conditions and the ability of users to participate in modifying the rules of the game.
Graduated Sanctions and Arbitration Discipline Users
In sustainable systems, monitoring is a byproduct of daily practice. Key elements include graduated sanctions—ranging from mild warnings to exclusion—and access to fast, low-cost conflict resolution mechanisms. This structure ensures that the logic of mutual understanding replaces the egoism of solitary reflection characteristic of the prisoner's dilemma.
Climate and Finance as Humanity’s Modern Commons
Today, Hardin’s "commons" are the global climate and the financial system. These resources are too vast for simple privatization, yet vulnerable to the free-rider problem. Every ton of emissions depletes the shared carbon budget, necessitating the construction of a multi-level governance architecture that links local and international levels.
AI Infrastructure: Digital Commons Under the Microscope
Artificial intelligence is a new, multi-layered common resource. It encompasses data, computing power, and foundation models. Commons models vary by region: the USA focuses on private competition among giants, Arab countries on state control, and the European Union on regulations that protect fundamental rights and treat data as a common good.
AI Algorithms: A New Tool for Monitoring Self-Governance
AI can become a tool for protecting the commons. AI algorithms enable precise, real-time monitoring of forests, water, or emissions. Consequently, monitoring ceases to be the monopoly of an external supervisor and becomes an instrument in the hands of self-governing communities, reducing information asymmetry and transaction costs.
Economic Crisis Repairs the Institutional Imagination
According to Mączyńska, crises expose the weaknesses of neoliberalism and provoke the search for new solutions. The opportunity lies in polycentricity—a system where multiple independent decision-making centers coexist and learn from one another. Such a distributed governance architecture outperforms centralization due to its greater resilience and better alignment with local needs.
Social Progress and Ecology: The Foundation of a New Economy
The primary goal can no longer be mere quantitative growth, but rather development that ensures social and ecological progress. This requires a shift from the logic of exploitation to stewardship. Artificial intelligence, woven into polycentric institutions, can support this process—provided its development is subordinated to the common good rather than solely to profit maximization.
Summary
In an era of global challenges, can we move beyond the dichotomy of the Leviathan and privatization? Ostrom’s research and Mączyńska’s diagnoses prove that polycentric, self-governing institutions are a viable alternative. The tragedy of the commons is not inevitable if we use technology to strengthen cooperation and accountability. The question is whether we can build a world where caring for shared resources is as natural as the pursuit of individual profit.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF