Introduction
Modern power has stopped building walls and started designing interfaces. This text analyzes the transition from Foucault’s disciplinary society to a digital society of control, in which the human becomes a dividual—an entity reduced to a stream of behavioral data. The authors diagnose surveillance capitalism as a system that eliminates the space for reflection—the so-called interval—through algorithmic modulation of desire. The reader will learn why freedom without infrastructure remains a mere constitutional decoration and how to reclaim agency in the age of algorithms through ritual and aesthetics.
From discipline to control: how algorithms design our choices
The power of control transforms the individual into a dividual, breaking a coherent biography into functional data particles. Instead of disciplining the body within closed institutions, the system operates on probabilities and vectors. Predictability replaces obedience, as algorithms do not force us into submission but subtly model the environment of choice, making it the "most convenient" one. Surveillance capitalism appropriates human experience, processing it into predictive products. The elimination of the interval—the gap between stimulus and response—causes subjectivity to vanish, giving way to automatic reflexes.
Beyond regulation: why AI requires a reconstruction of our practices
Legal regulations for AI, while necessary, are merely "risk accounting" and will not repair the human condition. We need the philosophy of Xunzi, which treats subjectivity as a construct requiring artifice and ritual. Protecting the opacity of the inner self is crucial, as only a being possessing a sphere of privacy can authentically respond to the call of the Other. Here, ritual acts as a counter-technology that stabilizes attention and vetoes the dictatorship of immediacy. Instead of naive technophobia, we must become conscious artisans of our own technicality, building a Dao—a practical path of self-cultivation.
Engineering freedom: how to build counter-machines in the age of control
Resisting the status of raw data requires a change in institutional architecture. Individual discipline is not enough; we must create technologies and communities that render systemic injustice inefficient. Aesthetics and beauty become tools for fighting the homogenization of life. Beauty, as an anti-entropic force, allows for the creation of forms that cannot be reduced to data and metrics. Designing technology must account for the "resistance of matter," which forces delay and reflection. By transforming passive resistance into active engineering, we reclaim agency, protecting our architecture of desire from algorithmic unification.
Summary
The hell of modernity does not need the face of a tyrant to effectively colonize our desires under the guise of ergonomic applications. In a world that sells us a premium fire extinguisher immediately after setting our house on fire, it becomes crucial to save that which cannot be optimized. In the era of algorithmic sociogeny, will we manage to preserve the ability to create forms of life that cannot be reduced to data? The answer lies in our readiness to be artisans of our own freedom, rather than mere consumers of ready-made interfaces.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF