The Long Twentieth Century: From the Triumph of Technology to the Crisis of Recognition

🇵🇱 Polski
The Long Twentieth Century: From the Triumph of Technology to the Crisis of Recognition

Introduction

This article analyzes J. Bradford DeLong’s concept of the "long twentieth century," spanning the years 1870–2010. This was an era in which the economy became the forge of human destiny, and humanity for the first time gained the tools to overcome biological constraints. Readers will discover how a triple innovation transformed the world, why material abundance failed to bring social peace, and what today’s crisis of legitimacy in the global order signifies.

1870: The Ontological Breakthrough of Modern Growth

The year 1870 represents an ontological breakthrough because it was then that the growth rate of the "stock of useful knowledge" permanently outpaced demographics. Previously, the world was ruled by the Malthusian devil—a ruthless mechanism where any increase in production was swallowed by population growth, famine, and war. Breaking this barrier was made possible by a triple innovation: globalization (exchange infrastructure), the modern corporation (scaling capital), and the industrial research laboratory (the method of serial invention).

The first phase of this era (until 1914) appears as an economic El Dorado, yet it was an asymmetrical success. While the industrial core grew wealthy, the rest of the world experienced the Great Divergence. A lack of stable institutions and law in the Global South meant that globalization became a tool for extraction rather than development, entrenching a civilizational divide.

Slouching Towards Utopia: The Slow March to Prosperity

DeLong calls this period slouching towards utopia because productive power (the objective order) diverged from the principles of just coexistence (the social order). The century’s intellectual axis is defined by a triad: Hayek (faith in spontaneous market order), Polanyi (a warning against the market destroying social bonds), and Keynes (a technocratic compromise ensuring stability).

The pinnacle of the era was the social democratic compromise (1945–1973), which, through state intervention, built the credibility of the promise of progress and strengthened the middle class. However, the neoliberal turn after 1973—a dogmatic response to stagflation—restored the primacy of the market over society. The result was material inequality and a subjective order dominated by the fear of status degradation, which ultimately undermined trust in institutions.

2010: The Symbolic End of the Long Century

The symbolic year 2010 marks the end of an era where economic growth was a universal solution. Today, technology alone does not guarantee justice; digital innovations often generate profits without creating stable jobs. Modern business operates under conditions of market fragmentation, where geopolitics and supply chain security become more important than pure cost efficiency.

The challenge of the future is a new triple innovation in the sphere of recognition. It is no longer enough to optimize production; we must design credibility-building institutions that reconcile technical progress with the dignity and security of citizens. Without a systemic framework for fair distribution, modernity will remain stuck in a normative chaos where material abundance coexists with a deep sense of injustice.

Summary

The long twentieth century proved that we can overcome scarcity, but it did not teach us how to manage abundance. Institutions build the credibility of the promise of progress, and their current crisis is a signal that old maps no longer fit the new territory. The future depends on whether we can combine technological innovation with social innovation, creating an order where progress is shared by all, not just the few.

📄 Full analysis available in PDF

Frequently Asked Questions

What does J. Bradford DeLong mean by the term "long twentieth century"?
This is an era stretching between 1870 and 2010, characterized by an unprecedented rate of economic growth and the dominance of economics over human fate.
What is the “Malthusian devil” mentioned in the article?
It is the personification of an impersonal mechanism that has imprisoned humanity in a state of biological equilibrium for millennia, destroying any production surplus.
Why is 1870 considered a breakthrough?
It was then that a triple innovation crystallized, allowing the growth of knowledge to permanently outpace the pace of demographic compensation.
What is the paradox of “dragging towards utopia”?
It lies in the fact that although humanity has mastered the technical means to create abundance, it is still unable to agree on fair rules for coexisting in this abundance.
What are the main critiques of DeLong's thesis?
The criticism concerns the author's too liberal treatment of historical sources and accusations of ideological bias in assessing the effects of capitalism.

Related Questions

Tags: The Long Twentieth Century J. Bradford DeLong Malthusian trap triple innovation globalization modern corporation research laboratory balance regime rule of recognition market economy market society a body of useful knowledge accumulation of production capacity the paradox of abundance economic determinism