Introduction
Logical hermeneutics is a method for the rigorous interpretation of philosophical texts through their formalization. It allows for the removal of ambiguities and the discovery of the logical skeleton of thought, transforming intuitive arguments into testable structures. The reader will learn how Bogusław Wolniewicz's ontology of situations redefines the understanding of reality and how logical rigor can coexist with the hermeneutic tradition of Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur.
Logical Hermeneutics and Translational Dictionaries
The process of interpretation begins with transcription, which involves purging the text of logical imperfections and supplementing arguments with unspoken premises. Then, using translational dictionaries, terms are translated into the language of system T. Atomization is crucial here—the components of theses are translated, which prevents the distortion of meaning.
This method is based on Roman Suszko's non-Fregean logic. In this view, sentences are not merely carriers of truth or falsehood but refer to specific situations in reality. The correctness of such a translation is verified by logical concordances and criteria of simplicity, naturalness, and the parsimony of the dictionary. The fewer new distinctions an interpretation requires, the more effective it is.
The Elementary Situation and the Algebraic Structure of Reality
The foundation of the system is the elementary situation (E-situation). It is the smallest fragment of reality that guarantees the truth of a given sentence. The set of all possible situations forms a complete lattice—an ordered structure in which the inclusion relation defines the logical connections between facts. Thanks to distributivity axioms, this ontology includes classical logic as a special case.
Wolniewicz confronts his vision with Tarski and Kripke semantics. While Kripke's starting point is possible worlds, for Wolniewicz, situations are primary, and worlds are merely their maximal, non-contradictory sets. This approach also differs from Barwise and Perry semantics, which, although it employs the concept of situations, rejects rigorous principles of logical separability in favor of pragmatism.
Models of the World and the Hermeneutic Tradition
The theory allows for the precise description of various ontological systems. Absolute monism reduces reality to a single, necessary world, while Laplacian determinism assumes a plurality of scenarios entirely dependent on the initial state. On the other hand, Humean atomism postulates the autonomous independence of situations, which Wittgenstein develops into the idea of the arbitrary combinability of elementary facts.
In dialogue with the classics, Wolniewicz treats the hermeneutics of Dilthey and Gadamer as a preliminary phase, preparing the ground for formal analysis. Paul Ricoeur proves to be the strongest ally. His concept of distantiation and the autonomy of the text provides a natural scaffolding for Wolniewicz's procedures. Consequently, the text can be studied as an entity independent of the author's intentions, and its ambiguity is captured within the rigors of local logical structures.
Summary
Bogusław Wolniewicz's logical hermeneutics proves that formalization does not have to mean reductionism. Through precise tools such as E-situations and translational dictionaries, the researcher gains the ability to objectively compare interpretations. However, can a logical translation exhaust the meaning of philosophy? Perhaps, in accordance with Wittgenstein's thought, the limits of language mark the limits of our world, and logical rigor is the best way to reliably describe those limits.
📄 Full analysis available in PDF