The Cuban Missile Crisis as an Experiment in Political Reason

• • 🇵🇱 Polski
The Cuban Missile Crisis as an Experiment in Political Reason

📚 Based on

Essence of decision
()
Longman

👤 About the Author

Philip Zelikow

University of Virginia

Philip Zelikow is an American diplomat, author, and international relations scholar. He has served in multiple administrations and is known for directing the 9/11 Commission. He is the White Burkett Miller Professor of History at the University of Virginia.

Graham Allison

Harvard Kennedy School

Graham Allison is a political scientist and the Douglas Dillon Professor of Government at Harvard's Kennedy School. He is an analyst of national security, nuclear weapons, and decision-making. His book, Essence of Decision, is a bestseller. He was also the Founding Dean of Harvard's Kennedy School.

📄 Download PDF 🎧 Listen (Audio)

The Cuban Missile Crisis: An In Vivo Decision-Making Laboratory

The 1962 crisis was an in vivo thought experiment conducted on the organism of civilization. It tests the resilience of procedures and the illusions regarding the rationality of systems armed with nuclear technology. Thanks to the analysis by Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow, this event became the foundation of decision theory, offering three lenses: the Rational Actor Model, Organizational Processes, and Bureaucratic Politics. Readers will discover how the collision of these logics shapes the survival of the species.

Model I: The Limits of Rationality in the Monolithic State

Model I assumes that the state is a unified entity maximizing utility. Through this lens, Kennedy and Khrushchev: a calculation of gains and losses explains the course of the crisis. The USSR rationally defended Cuba and sought to correct the missile imbalance, while the US chose a blockade as an intermediate option. However, this elegant picture is a "cheap approximation" that ignores the limits of rationality—cognitive biases and the lack of full information.

Model II: Organizational Routine Paralyzes Policy

Model II reminds us that the government is a federation of organizations operating according to standard operating procedures. This is why bureaucratic logic dictated the course of the 1962 crisis: Soviet engineers failed to camouflage the missiles because they built them according to standard USSR blueprints. Meanwhile, the American Air Force, instead of a "surgical strike," proposed a full-scale invasion because their doctrine demanded it.

Model III: The Power Struggle Within the State Apparatus

Model III portrays the state as an arena for power struggles within the government apparatus. Decisions are not the plan of a master strategist but the outcome of bargaining between players. Kennedy had to balance between hawks in Congress and his generals, building coalitions. Presidential power proved to be, in essence, the power of persuasion rather than simply issuing orders.

Artificial Intelligence Destabilizes Deterrence

Introducing AI into nuclear systems promises full rationality but, in practice, creates black boxes: the opacity of command systems. Algorithms can generate false alarms, shortening the time for political consultations. The integration of AI with NC3 means that machine-written routines can produce escalatory signals beyond human control, making the system more fragile.

Allison’s Aporias: Theoretical Gaps in the Three Models

Allison’s models contain aporias: the totalization of rationality (ignoring minor errors), organizational fetishism, and the temptation of cynicism. Furthermore, the US, Europe, and the Arab World: a geopolitics of memory shows that the crisis is interpreted differently—from a myth of success to a memento of dependency. Nuclear war: paradoxes of law and economics reveals that in the face of annihilation, classic cost calculations and legal norms fail. This was the era that gave rise to modern pop culture and dread: the birth of the apocalyptic imagination.

Summary

In the era of algorithms and automation, will the Cuban Missile Crisis remain merely a warning from the past, or will it become a self-fulfilling prophecy unfolding before our eyes? Perhaps it is time we stopped treating history as a dataset for analysis and started experiencing it as a lesson in humility? For is it not in humility, rather than in algorithms, that the key to survival lies?

📄 Full analysis available in PDF

📖 Glossary

Model Racjonalnego Aktora
Założenie, że państwo działa jak jednolity podmiot podejmujący logiczne decyzje w celu maksymalizacji subiektywnej użyteczności.
Standardowe Procedury Operacyjne (SOP)
Ustalony zestaw rutynowych działań wewnątrz organizacji, które determinują sposób realizacji decyzji politycznych przez wykonawców.
Racjonalność Ograniczona
Koncepcja wskazująca, że decydenci wybierają opcje wystarczająco dobre z powodu limitów poznawczych, czasu oraz braku pełnej informacji.
ExComm (Executive Committee)
Specjalny komitet doradczy powołany przez Johna F. Kennedy'ego do wypracowania reakcji na obecność radzieckich rakiet na Kubie.
MRBM i IRBM
Pociski balistyczne średniego i pośredniego zasięgu, które stanowiły kluczowy element radzieckiego arsenału rozmieszczonego na wyspie.
Kwarantanna morska
Eufemistyczne określenie blokady morskiej Kuby, zastosowane przez USA, aby uniknąć formalnego wypowiedzenia wojny.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Rational Actor Model in the context of the Cuban Missile Crisis?
This is a simplification that assumes that a state is a unified organism making logical decisions, such as deploying missiles to improve the balance of strategic power.
Why were Soviet missiles in Cuba not properly camouflaged?
According to the Organizational Process Model, Soviet engineering units mechanically replicated standard construction procedures from the USSR, ignoring the specifics of tropical terrain.
What role did the US naval blockade play in the crisis?
The blockade was a rational middle ground that put pressure on the USSR while leaving room to maneuver and avoid immediate nuclear war.
What does the concept of 'bounded rationality' mean in foreign policy?
It means that decision-makers operate in a world of incomplete information and time pressure, which means that their choices are the result of cognitive simplifications rather than perfect optimization.
Why does Allison believe that state decisions are a byproduct of a clash of logics?
Because the final policy results from the friction between the calculations of leaders, the routines of large organizations, and the internal political games of officials.

Related Questions

🧠 Thematic Groups

Tags: Cuban Missile Crisis Graham Allison rational actor organizational processes bureaucratic politics 1962 decision theory cold war ExComm strategic imbalance standard operating procedures limited rationality maritime quarantine nuclear escalation