Virtuality, the Body, and AGI: Phenomenology and Ethics of the Future

🇵🇱 Polski
Virtuality, the Body, and AGI: Phenomenology and Ethics of the Future

Introduction

In the era of augmented reality (AR) and artificial general intelligence (AGI), the boundary between the real and the generated is rapidly blurring. Modern virtuality is not just a technology, but primarily a challenge to our phenomenology—the way we experience the world. This article analyzes how digital images impact our bodies, social trust, and identity. You will learn why we need a new "hygiene of modes" and how technical standards can protect the status of truth in a world dominated by deepfakes.

Leib, Milgram’s Continuum, and the Clinical Picture of Hypervirtuality

At the foundation of human experience lies the Leib—the living, sensing, and mortal body. It differs fundamentally from an avatar, which is merely a product from a digital catalog. While the body makes the world real through the senses, the avatar serves as a prosthesis for the imagination. Milgram and Kishino’s Continuum categorizes these technologies, showing a fluid transition from pure perception of the real world, through mixed reality (MR), to total virtuality.

However, the phenomenon of hypervirtuality carries clinical risks. In the ICD-11 classification, the WHO identifies gaming disorder, characterized by a loss of control and the prioritization of the digital world over the physical one. The key mechanism here is the "occupation of the field of consciousness," where virtual goals become more important than real needs. Therapy requires a re-education of perceptual modes and a return to embodied activities rooted in the physical "here and now."

Deepfakes, the C2PA Standard, and Phenomenological Hygiene

The development of deepfake technology has led to an inflation of social trust. When "everything can be fabricated," our default perceptual certainty erodes. The technological response is the C2PA standard—a system of cryptographic signatures that allows for the verification of the origin and edit history of digital materials. It is a digital "vaccine," restoring an ontological anchor for our senses.

Technology alone, however, is not enough. The author proposes the introduction of phenomenological hygiene within a "School of Distinctions." Its goal is to train the recognition of one's own internal states: whether we are currently in the mode of perception, image, or fantasy. Simultaneously, we must fight for perception zones—public spaces free from digital AR smog. We have a right to "visual silence," protecting us from behavioral overlays and advertisements woven into the landscape.

AGI, the Paradox of Transcendence, and Man as Fluid Code

Can AGI become an authentic "Other" in the ethical sense? Phenomenology suggests not. The machine possesses neither natural intentionality nor a body that can feel pain. Its declarations are simulations, not experiences. However, virtuality redefines our myths and the sacred, offering technological transcendence. VR allows one to leave the body within the interface, resembling a religious promise of immortality, yet it is a "light sacred," devoid of the weight of real suffering.

In this new ontology, man becomes fluid code—a process rather than a fixed substance. Identity becomes configurable, raising the question: who manages this code? New metrics, such as the Inversion Ratio (IR), which measures the ratio of valuing irreality over reality, serve to monitor health in this world. Interestingly, the approach to AR filters varies culturally: in Asia, they are a form of politeness; in Scandinavia, a manifestation of the fear of authenticity.

Summary

We stand at the threshold of the era of the "plastic human," where the boundary between biology and algorithm is becoming transparent. The key to survival is not escaping technology, but the conscious harmonization of all incarnations—from the physical body to digital footprints. We must implement "axiological algorithms" based on truth and goodness, so that our identity does not become merely a subscription product. The true transcendence of the future is not the abandonment of the body, but the art of maintaining authenticity in a world of constant simulation.

📄 Full analysis available in PDF

Frequently Asked Questions

How does perception differ from imagination in the digital world?
Perception is a mode of making reality present, in which we believe in the existence of things, while imagination is an operation on the absent, suspending this original belief.
What are the clinical effects of excessive VR exposure?
According to the ICD-11 classification, gaming disorder may occur, manifesting itself by loss of control and the occupation of the field of consciousness by virtual objects at the expense of physical life.
How does the C2PA standard help fight deepfakes?
It enables the use of cryptographic signatures (Content Credentials), which allow machine and human eyes to verify the source and history of content modifications.
Can AGI have the same consciousness as a human?
According to the text, AGI lacks natural intentionality and bodily rootedness (Leib), which is why its declarations of feelings are merely simulations, not authentic experiences.
What is the 'School of Distinction' in the education of the future?
It is a cognitive training model that teaches children and adults to recognize and name their own internal states, such as perceptual or fantasy modes.

Related Questions

Tags: AGI phenomenology mixed reality C2PA deepfake hypervirtuality intentionality Leib ICD-11 Milgram-Kishino continuum digital sacred technological transcendence Content Credentials perception imagination